Page 6 – DNABitcoinbroker

Compliance Checklist for European Institutional Investors in Crypto Assets

March, 2025

Europe has continued to see growth and maturity within its crypto market. This is especially true with investors looking to invest in digital assets. However, the regulatory landscape for crypto in Europe is still complex and changing by the day.

For compliance purposes, institutional investors must do their due diligence and follow set regulations. The checklist below is a good place to start.

I. Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know-Your-Customer (KYC)

Conduct customer due diligence: All investor IDs need verification, and companies must conduct an analysis of customer risk profiles before authorizations.
Implement AML/KYC procedures: Have clear procedures for monitoring and reporting suspicious transactions.
Comply with EU AML directives: Adhere to the EU’s 4th and 5th AML directives. It calls for the identification and verification of clients.

II. MiFID II and MiFIR

Determine MiFID II applicability: Assess whether MiFID II applies to your crypto investments.
Comply with best execution requirements: Ensure that trades are executed in clients’ best interests.
Provide transparency and reporting: Disclose trading information and other relevant data to clients and regulators.

III. Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)

Detect and prevent market abuse: Have robust systems for detecting and preventing market abuse. It can be in the form of insider trading and or market manipulation.
Comply with reporting requirements: Suspicious transactions need to be submitted to relevant authorities through required reporting procedures.

IV. Capital Requirements Directive (CRD)

CRD applicability: Establish if CRD regulations apply to your cryptographic assets and their associated investment decisions.
Comply with capital requirements: Hold enough capital to cover potential losses.
Liquidity requirements: The company needs to maintain an adequate level of cash reserves to fulfil all client payment obligations.

V. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Protect personal data: Follow GDPR rules to protect all personal data during collection, processing, and maintenance.
Comply with data subject rights: Respect user data rights. This includes the right to access and erasure.

VI. EU’s 5th AML Directive (AMLD5)

AMLD5 Requirements: BTCE must fulfil AMLD5 requirements by following the EU’s 5^th AML directive that demands crypto-asset service providers to register their operations.
Due Diligence: The organization needs to perform comprehensive due diligence assessments for high-risk clients.

VII. Crypto-Specific Regulations

National Regulation: National crypto investment policies for EU countries require your knowledge through adherence to their legislative guidelines.
MiCA Regulation: The company must follow the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, which sets clear rules for crypto-asset service provider regulation and supervision.

VIII. Operational Risk Management

Risk Management: Operational risk management procedures should include procedures for security and IT system protection, as well as cybersecurity requirements.
Business Plan: Develop business continuity plans to secure organizational operations during disruptions.

IX. Tax Compliance

Comply with tax laws and regulations: Grasp all tax laws governing crypto investments in the EU.
Report tax obligations: Diligently report tax obligations to relevant authorities.

X. Ongoing Monitoring and Review

Review Compliance Procedures: Institutions should examine compliance procedures frequently to verify their validity as well as their most recent updates.
Regulatory Developments: Companies should track all current developments related to EU regulations.

Institutional investors can use this checklist as a starting point in their quest for safe and by-the-book investment in Europe’s ever-dynamic world of crypto. For success, always be on the lookout for trends, news and expert advice on new or amended crypto regulations.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment or financial advice.

Read more →

Taxation and Reporting Standards: DAC8 and CARF

March, 2025

| No Comments

| Bitcoin

The expansion of the crypto-asset market undoubtedly drives governments to strengthen their tax compliance efforts. In April 2021, the G20 commissioned the OECD to establish a system for fully automated reporting regarding crypto-asset tax information. Later, the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) was approved in…

Read more →

MiCA vs. Global Crypto Asset Regulations in 2025

March, 2025

| No Comments

| Regulation Crypto

Cryptocurrencies continue to flex their muscles in transforming the financial sector as they empower decentralized transactions and develop new economic systems. Thus far, regulatory frameworks are still trying to keep up with crypto development, thereby causing nations to implement different payment regulations. The crypto…

Read more →

Bitcoin or Real Estate? Time to Change How We Think About Wealth

March, 2025

| No Comments

| Bitcoin

Historically, real estate has earned its place as a reliable method for wealth preservation. Due to its physical nature, real estate differs from stocks and cash deposits. Real estate provides three distinct benefits: residence, inheritance, and its tangible aspect. The permanent nature of property assets makes ownership a vital foundation for financial security throughout Europe.

But what if the thing that makes real estate attractive—its physicality—is also its greatest undoing?

How Fragile is Traditional Wealth?

The downside of real estate has been brought to light countless times by natural disasters, the most recent being the Los Angeles fire that consumed thousands of residential and business premises. Furthermore, not long ago, wildfires also burnt down entire community houses throughout Southern Europe. Germany and Belgium also experienced catastrophic flooding, obliterating houses and creating complications for families and insurance compensation processes.

Natural disasters remind us that properties remain susceptible to natural occurrences. Regardless of the price, a house remains permanently fixed to its geographical position. An asset’s worth diminishes instantly upon disaster. Property wealth cannot be considered as secure as most people think.

Moreover, administrative difficulties, financial challenges, and governmental structure influence property value beyond natural dangers. Housing prices are influenced by property taxes, government rules, and housing policy designs meant to solve the housing crisis. The perks of real estate investment face several restrictions from government to government, i.e., rent controls and limitations on foreign property ownership.

Bitcoin: A Different Kind of Asset

Bitcoin defies geographic limitations that typically bind property ownership to a specific location. It is a digital asset that stays independent of governments, economies, and physical locations; it is stored in digital wallets.

The key difference? Bitcoin is beyond physical destruction since it cannot be destroyed by fire and remains out of reach of natural calamities or theft. Investors and users of Bitcoin can easily retrieve it through an internet connection from any corner of the world. Your assets remain portable because you can carry them during times of emergency, whether you need to relocate because of wars or political unrest. Typically, real estate ownership doesn’t have the luxury for such.

Most Europeans now see financial security that extends past their home country as a growing necessity. Past events demonstrate how most stable countries can encounter economic recessions or political transformations that affect real estate valuations.

The Future of Wealth Preservation

Bitcoin’s main advantage is its enduring ability: no maintenance work, legal coverage, or insurance ramifications. Also, Bitcoin remains unreachable through border seizures. The nature of Bitcoin prevents it from being devalued through government decisions and policies, as with fiat currency. Indeed, Bitcoin is a new and innovative form of ownership system, a new type of property that provides security during unpredictable world circumstances.

Although Bitcoin has its downside, it is still an innovative property type. The value of Bitcoin fluctuates unpredictably, and users need technical know-how and proper security methods to own and store it digitally. The rising awareness about traditional wealth storage weaknesses makes decentralized assets that resist corruption more appealing.

For decades, real estate has been the standard method of maintaining wealth. Change is accurate and demands a shift in wealth accumulation and storage strategy. Our views about healthy financial security need re-evaluation as holding wealth in an untouchable form could be the safest strategy in the years to come.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment or financial advice.

Read more →

Green Cryptocurrencies and Why Are They Important?

March, 2025

| No Comments

| Bitcoin

As you explore the ever-evolving world of Cryptocurrency, you may have encountered a new player in this field: green cryptocurrencies. These new digital assets are designed with sustainability in mind.

Primarily, the concept deals with environmental concerns of traditional Cryptocurrencies using green technology and energy-efficient mining processes. In their way, they symbolize the gradual acceptance of sustainability and longevity in digital economies.

Understanding Green Cryptocurrencies

As opposed to conventional Cryptocurrencies that use intense power and depend on Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanisms, green cryptocurrencies have developed ingenious alternatives aimed at less energy consumption and tilt toward sustainability.

Green cryptocurrencies mostly use Proof of Stake (PoS). This uses a validator selection mechanism based on the number of coins each holds from a single crypto wallet instead of a tedious calculation of mathematical problems by miners. No more energy-consuming mining is required.

Proof of Space (PoSpace) is an alternative method that utilizes unused storage capacity to secure the network—Chia, a Cryptocurrency that utilizes unoccupied disk space, hence more energy-efficient operations.

Some green Cryptocurrency initiatives enhance their sustainability measures by incorporating renewable energy sources into their operations or by supporting carbon offset programs. These efforts guarantee that any remaining emissions from their networks are reduced.

Why Green Cryptocurrencies Matter

The significance of green Cryptocurrency is found in its capacity to tackle the environmental deficiencies of conventional Cryptocurrency while preserving the advantages of blockchain technology.

To begin with, they directly address the significant energy usage linked to mining. It is believed that Bitcoin uses energy equivalent to that of some small countries each year and carries an equally substantial carbon footprint. Eco-friendly Cryptocurrencies reduce this impact significantly by keeping in line with global climate goals within the crypto domain.

In addition, the growing concern around sustainability has placed different industries on accountability for their carbon emissions. Green Cryptocurrencies are perennial in recognition of some sustainability goals, supported by the sustainable future of Blockchain technology.

Investors are beginning to pay attention as well. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing is becoming mainstream and thus puts sustainability rather at the forefront of financial decisions. Eco-friendly Cryptocurrencies attract environmentally conscious investors and companies, appealing to more newcomers.

Therefore, the result is a generation of green Cryptocurrencies. which brings about more creativity. It creates an opportunity for all technological ingeniousness that gives room for the practicality, usefulness, and efficiency of Blockchain networks to improve the crypto space as a whole further.

Popular Eco-Friendly Cryptocurrencies to Keep an Eye On include:

– Chia (XCH): Chia harnesses idle computer storage in a standard desktop environment. It minimizes energy requirements for the operation of other typical Blockchain networks by solving Proof of Space and Time.
– Cardano (ADA): Cardano is based on a Proof of Stake framework; this means energy efficiency and long-term sustainability.
– Nano (NANO): Nano’s lightweight and extremely efficient block-lattice structure eliminates mining and severely limits energy needs.
– Algorand (ALGO): This Blockchain is carbon-neutral by design, with sustainability woven into its very fabric.

Challenges and Opportunities

Although they hold potential, green cryptocurrencies encounter several obstacles. Adoption continues to be a major obstacle since numerous crypto enthusiasts and miners are deeply rooted in conventional systems. Moreover, there are ongoing discussions regarding the safety and decentralisation of alternative methods, such as Proof of Stake in relation to Proof of Work.

Nonetheless, these obstacles can be overcome. As awareness of climate change rises and regulatory pressures increase, the need for sustainable Blockchain solutions is expected to grow. Eco-friendly Cryptocurrencies are poised to spearhead this transition, providing a framework for responsible and progressive progress.

The rise of eco-friendly Cryptocurrencies represents more than a fad—it’s an essential progression. As Blockchain technology continues to grow its impact, the sector must evolve to address the environmental and social issues we face today.

As the movement expands, the inquiry is no longer about whether green Cryptocurrencies will influence the future but how swiftly they will become the norm.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.

Read more →

How Cryptocurrency is Reshaping the Future of Formula 1 and Motorsport

March, 2025

| No Comments

| Blockchain

Formula 1 (F1) racing and Cryptocurrency are rapidly changing how fans, teams, and even sponsors interact with motorsport. This connection is already making waves in the F1 space and as such, diverse elements like digital assets and Blockchain become more instrumental in delivering this…

Read more →

How Institutions Can Invest in Bitcoin Under Europe’s MiCA Regulations

March, 2025

| No Comments

| Bitcoin

Indeed, Bitcoin has always been a bit of a rebel – thriving outside traditional finance, resisting regulation, and attracting excitement and scepticism. But in Europe, things are shifting. The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation is stepping in to bring structure to the chaos, offering institutions a straightforward way to invest in Bitcoin without legal headaches.

So, if you’re a bank, hedge fund, or investment firm looking to get in on Bitcoin, how do you do it without stepping on regulatory landmines?

MiCA: The Rulebook Bitcoin Never Had

For years, investing in Bitcoin was like playing in the Wild West – some countries embraced it, others banned it, and many had no idea what to do with it. MiCA changes that.

The regulation sets the rules for crypto across the EU, making it easier and safer for institutions to enter. Bitcoin, under MiCA, is categorised as a crypto-asset, not a currency or security, just its own thing. Institutions don’t have to worry about things like capital reserves (which Stablecoin issuers do), but they still have to follow some strict rules.

Institutions must begin by choosing a MiCA-compliant custodian or exchange. They cannot use just about any platform and must be selective. A regulated custodian is secure and compliant, but self-custody gives them more control at a higher level of responsibility. Institutions can keep Bitcoin in-house if they want but must have strict security and risk controls to keep it in place.

Once an institution acquires Bitcoin, compliance becomes a key focus. MiCA enforces strict know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money-laundering (AML) controls; transactions must be transparent, and counterparties must be known. Anonymity in transactions is no longer an option, and financial institutions must maintain accurate records regarding their dealings in Bitcoin to avoid penalties. Transparency does not stop there- financial institutions must report transactions and holdings upon inquiry, ensuring crypto transactions are above board.

For those not comfortable holding Bitcoin outright, MiCA makes investing possible via supervised financial products like Bitcoin ETPs and crypto funds. The latter offers exposure to Bitcoin price movements without complexity and with direct compliance.

With these steps in place, financial institutions can safely enter MiCA’s Bitcoin market in a secure and predictable investing environment without being deterred by uncertainty in regulations.

Why MiCA is Good for Institutional Bitcoin Investment

Some investors see regulation as a buzzkill. But here is the thing: MiCA makes Bitcoin more attractive to institutions.

Many firms have avoided Bitcoin for years because of fraud, hacking risks, and regulatory uncertainty. Now, MiCA removes doubt by ensuring safety. It forces crypto exchanges to follow strict security guidelines, reduces the risk of shady market manipulation, and ensures that institutions can invest without worrying about a legal crackdown.

Another big plus? Market stability. With better oversight, institutions can finally trust the crypto market. That means fewer rug pulls and scams and a more predictable investment environment.

MiCA isn’t just another regulation. The framework gives institutions a clear, structured path to investing in Bitcoin. What was once a volatile and uncertain market has matured, making it accessible beyond just retail traders and crypto enthusiasts.

With MiCA, institutions no longer have to navigate regulatory grey areas or worry about compliance risks. The rules are set, and the guardrails are in place. The crypto revolution isn’t coming – it’s already here.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment or financial advice.

Read more →

The United Kingdom in the Post-MiCA Age: The Path Ahead for Crypto Regulation

March, 2025

| No Comments

| Regulation Crypto

Massive things are in play in crypto. The European Union (EU) implemented new regulations; MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets). These set of rules basically stipulate how crypto businesses should operate. The elephant in the room is where does this place the UK?

Since the UK is no longer in the EU, it no longer has to follow MiCA. That could be good since the UK can decide what is best for its economy.

However, it also raises questions. Without concrete regulations, crypto businesses can’t know if they should or should not move to the UK. So will Britain’s approach allow it to be a crypto leader, or will businesses be attracted to the better-coordinated system in the EU?

What Is MiCA, and Why Does It Matter?

MiCA is a new set of laws designed to make the crypto market in the EU safer and more predictable. It targets crypto exchanges, Stablecoins, and digital asset providers.

MiCA is straightforward in principle. It is tasked with protecting investors from scams and making businesses as transparent as possible and subject to simple guidelines. At the same time, it is tasked with preventing financial crime in the form of money laundering and making crypto in the EU market safer and more secure.

This is both good and bad for businesses. On one hand, they now have a clear guide on what’s allowed. On the other hand, the rules are strict, meaning extra paperwork and costs.

But while the EU is following MiCA, the UK is doing its own thing.

–>

The UK’s Different Approach

Instead of copying MiCA, the UK created its rules under the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA). The idea is to give businesses more freedom while still keeping things safe.

One area where the UK is taking a different path is Stablecoins (cryptocurrencies tied to real-world money like the US dollar or British pound). The EU’s MiCA has tough restrictions on them, but the UK is taking a friendlier approach, allowing Stablecoins to be part of its financial system. This could make the UK a great place for fintech start-ups looking to innovate.

But still, the UK’s crypto rules aren’t fully ready yet. This leaves businesses in an awkward situation as they don’t know exactly what to really expect. That kind of uncertainty can be risky. Some companies might prefer the EU because its rules are already in place.

Challenges the UK Faces

The UK is one of the biggest financial hubs in the world, coming second just after New York. It is home to major banks and investment firms and home to countless crypto start-ups. But how long will this be the position?

Here are some challenges the UK needs to deal with:

- – Unclear rules – Businesses need to know what’s legal and what’s not. Some companies might hesitate to invest until the UK finalises its crypto laws.

- Investor confidence—Big investors like clear regulations. The EU has that with MiCA, but the UK is still working on it. If investors don’t feel safe, they’ll put their money elsewhere.

- Extra costs for businesses—A UK-based crypto company that wants to operate in the EU must follow UK and MiCA rules, which increases costs.

If the UK wants to stay ahead, it needs to act fast. Otherwise, companies might decide to move to the EU instead.

We can safely say the UK is at a crossroads. The fintech magnet has the chance to create a crypto-friendly environment appealing to multinationals and local investors. But again, without clear regulations, it risks falling behind the EU.

Will the UK’s flexible approach make it a global crypto leader? Or will businesses prefer the safer, more structured rules in the EU? The decisions made in the next few years will shape the future of crypto in the UK.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment or financial advice.

Read more →

MiCA and Stablecoins – What’s the Real Risk for Crypto Traders?

February, 2025

| No Comments

| Bitcoin

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation provides oversight and stability while establishing clarity in the fast-evolving field of digital assets. The core purpose of MiCA is investor protection alongside financial stability. Yet, its approach toward Stablecoin has stirred major controversy since it links its value to conventional currencies and specific commodities. The tightening regulatory measures have crypto traders questioning both the implications of MiCA on Stablecoins and forthcoming dangers.

So, what does MiCA regulation mean for Stablecoins, and what possible risks should you expect?

The Conundrum Around Stablecoin

Stablecoins connect crypto platforms and established conventional financial sectors. During intense market volatility, Stablecoins provide traders with a reliable fund that retains its steady value. Yet the rising popularity of Stablecoins makes regulators uneasy about potential market risks which stem from liquidity concerns, redemption issues, and reserve fund withdrawals.

Through MiCA, Stablecoin companies must meet extensive requirements that demand minimum asset reserves, disclosure standards and transaction volume restrictions for selected Stablecoins. The regulatory measures seek to prevent destabilising events like the TerraUSD collapse from reoccurring. Despite decreasing overall market risks, the new regulatory framework introduces operational hurdles to traders who depend on Stablecoins for daily trading activities.

Stringent market reserve guidelines may push up Stablecoin expenses, which could transfer these additional costs to their end-users through service fees. Volume caps might slow the market expansion potential of selected Stablecoins, thus reducing their suitability for large transactions.

Will Stablecoin Restrictions Create New Opportunities for Bitcoin?

New restrictions on Stablecoins under MiCA regulations could benefit decentralised Cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin. Historically, Stablecoins have served as an entry point for new investors within the crypto market to access trading exchanges. The reduced appeal of Stablecoins subsequently causes investors to put their capital into well-recognized decentralised assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum and alternative Blockchain-based currencies.

Bitcoin is the principal beneficiary among digital currencies that stand to gain from intermittent market shifts in the Cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin operates outside centralised control to provide traders with regulatory freedom and immunity to governmental oversight. During extreme economic turmoil, institutional investors rely on Bitcoin as a valuable storage method because its limited supply and growing user base draw their funds for wealth protection in uncertain financial conditions.

Numerous challenges will emerge during the entire transition to this alternative method. Furthermore, price instability makes it difficult for various traders in crypto to depend on Bitcoin since it lacks the operating principles of Stablecoins. The growing popularity of Bitcoin will likely worsen speed issues in its processing and simultaneously increase transaction costs. The future of Bitcoin as an asset class leader depends on addressing core defects even though MiCA-related market modifications could positively affect its short-term position.

How Can Businesses Prepare for Liquidity Issues Under MiCA?

Diversify Stablecoin Exposure: Businesses can reduce reliance on a single Stablecoin by using multiple MiCA-compliant and decentralised Stablecoins to mitigate risks.
– Strengthen Liquidity Buffers: Investors can maintain enough fiat or liquid asset reserves and conduct regular stress tests to address potential liquidity constraints.
– Adopt Bitcoin and Other Cryptocurrencies: Businesses can also choose to explore Bitcoin and crypto-based financial products as alternative payment and settlement solutions.
– Stay Informed and Engage with Regulators: Investors should keep up with MiCA regulations, engage with regulators, and monitor global regulatory developments.
– Invest in Compliance and Technology: Robust, compliant systems and technology solutions would help meet MiCA requirements and ensure operational resilience.

What are the Possible Risks for Crypto Traders?

For some time now, Crypto traders have benefited from Stablecoins’ flexibility and accessibility. They have used them as a safe haven and medium for speedy transactions across crypto exchanges.

However, MiCA’s stringent rules could mean:

– Reduced Availability of Stablecoins: Some issuers may exit the EU market due to MiCA compliance challenges, which will limit Stablecoin options.
– Increased Costs and Friction: Compliance costs may lead to higher fees, lower yields, and slower transaction processing.
– Market Volatility and Uncertainty: MiCA’s transition phase could cause instability, affecting liquidity and pegging of major Stablecoins.
– Geographic Fragmentation: MiCA’s EU-only scope may create regulatory inconsistencies, impacting cross-border trading and compliance.

Overall, the real risk for crypto traders lies not in the regulations but in failing to adapt to the changing tides. Those who anticipate shifts, diversify strategically, and prioritize compliance will emerge stronger—and perhaps even thrive—in the post-MiCA era.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment or financial advice.

Read more →

The MiCA Loopholes: What Institutions Can Still Do

February, 2025

| No Comments

| Regulation Crypto

The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation introduces fundamental changes in how the European Union oversees crypto assets. MiCA achieves two main objectives through its regulatory framework: investor protection and increased market visibility while providing financial stability to crypto assets.

Institutions can use specific regulatory exemptions called “loopholes” to successfully navigate MiCA and maintain cost-effective transactions while engaging in non-custodial trading activities.

Navigating MiCA Without Breaking the Bank

The main operational and transaction cost concern for institutions implementing MiCA is the greater regulatory oversight that they face. The bulk of innovative businesses recognize MiCA obligations as their opportunity to develop compliance frameworks that avoid large expenses.

The following approaches can be helpful to institutions:

1. Leveraging Technological Innovation

Modern financial institutions use automated smart contracts technology to enhance their compliance process management. MiCA-compliant automated reporting and real-time monitoring solutions powered by Blockchain enable both proper standards maintenance and automated cost-efficient operations that would have required manual interventions in the past.

2. Optimizing Clearing and Settlement Mechanisms

Clearing and settlement system infrastructure powered by distributed ledger technology and algorithms can perform transactions more efficiently to decrease operational expenses. Organizations supporting these technologies achieve faster trade processing, which preserves and maximizes the size-related benefits of their operations despite regulatory costs.

3. Partnering with Specialized Service Providers

Establishing partnerships with companies focused on regulatory technology enables institutions to distribute their compliance duties. These providers give advanced solutions that improve your ability to stay compliant with MiCA rules while minimizing transaction expenses.

4. Adopting a Compliance-by-Design Approach

Forward-thinking establishments include regulatory requirements within their platform design foundations to minimize the need for future retroactive adjustments. The proactive design approach lowers the costs of necessary retroactive changes, which helps institutions run lean operations in various regulatory environments.

Non-Custodial Trading Under MiCA

Many institutions focus on non-custodial trading access because it lets users maintain asset ownership control, reducing counterparty risks and requirements for centralized fund storage. The introduction of MiCA concentrates mainly on regulating custodial trading, but institutionally, it still enables certain avenues to offer non-custodial trading services.

While MiCA largely addresses custodial trading practices, there are still potential avenues for institutions to facilitate non-custodial trading:

1. Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Protocols

Most decentralized platforms function under principles that do away with their need for traditional custodial practices. Financial institutions that integrate DeFi protocols and smart contracts can develop non-custodial trading systems which avoid the principal requirements of MiCA as asset custodian. These platforms require thorough risk management systems that meet all regulatory requirements.

2. Peer-to-Peer Trading Networks

Creating novel peer-to-peer transaction platforms, either individually or through cooperation, is another regulatory option for institutions. These networks allow buyers and sellers to match directly since participants can execute transactions without needing the firm to hold any assets in custody, thus offering a decentralized and fee-efficient trading environment.

3. Innovative Client Wallet Solutions

The widespread adoption of integrated wallet solutions offers institutions a secure method to combine traditional warfare protocols with decentralized wallet capabilities. Clients maintain control of their passwords through private key ownership. Still, the institution offers users a secure platform that supports trading activities as per accepted guidelines and without taking complete ownership of assets.

Best Practices and Cautions

We can safely say that these opportunities are promising. Thus, institutions should do their due diligence as they explore these “loopholes.”

Here’s how:

- – Proactive legal consultation.

- – Robust risk management.
- - – Transparency and consumer education.

Read more →

What Are Over-the-counter (OTC) Derivatives?

February, 2025

| No Comments

| Bitcoin

Over-the-counter derivatives are financial instruments that receive their value through direct private agreements between market participants instead of through traditional exchange marketplaces. Exchange-traded instruments differ from these contracts as OTC derivatives receive private negotiation treatments between counterparties, allowing them to customise their terms. The…

Read more →

MiCA vs US Crypto Regulations: A Comparative Perspective

February, 2025

| No Comments

| Regulation Crypto

The trajectory and future of the crypto industry depend heavily on proper regulation because its expansion is imminent. The European Union establishes itself as a global leader in crypto-regulations through its proactive implementation of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).

Basically, the United States has not established a single regulatory framework that solely focuses on the crypto industry while adopting fragmented qualities through enforcement methods. The regulatory differences between these markets shape financial institutions’ operational environment through all of its benefits and difficulties.

MiCA: A Unified Framework for Europe

The European Union established MiCA as its standardized regulatory system, which functions throughout all Member Countries. The implementation process of MiCA began with the June 30, 2024, adoption of the Asset-Referenced Token and E-Money Token framework for Stablecoins under the MiCA label.

Crypto-asset service Providers (CASPs) had an order to abide by the regulations from December 30 2024. Ostensibly, in the early weeks of 2025, the EU established a complete regulatory structure for crypto assets.

So, what does MiCA entail?

– Licensing Requirements.
– Consumer Protection.
– Stablecoin Oversight.
– Market Abuse Rules.

By harmonizing European regulations, MiCA reduces uncertainty, innovation, and adoption. These peculiar moves level the playing field for businesses operating in the EU crypto market.

The US: A Patchwork of Regulations and Enforcement Actions

Crypto asset regulations in the United States do not follow the single integrated framework that the EU very much implements. Various regulatory bodies maintain authority over different sectors of the crypto market, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The current division in regulatory oversight has produced unclear conditions about which crypto assets match the definition of securities.

US regulators have built the crypto industry through their enforcement actions as they did not create specific guidelines. For a long time, the approach has created difficulties for business compliance efforts as well as hindered market innovation in various sectors.

The regulatory framework exists in separate ways across various US states. A typical example is the state of Wyoming, which supports crypto initiatives through its friendly policies, as opposed to New York, which established the heavy-handed BitLicense framework that limits Cryptocurrency operations. Federal incoherence regarding crypto regulation has resulted in variable standards and increased regulatory complexity, which frustrates businesses that expand into numerous states.

Federal-level regulatory agreements on central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and similar matters have shown little to no advancement thus far. The US Crypto market is fragmented because of diverging approaches between states and cities, creating hurdles for start-ups and already-established financial institutions.

Implications for Financial Institutions

The regulatory differences between the EU and the US present unique situations for businesses and financial institutions.

– In Europe, MiCA offers the digital asset space clarity, consistency, and credibility. Companies can literally streamline operations and reduce compliance costs by obtaining a single EU-wide license. This makes it easier to scale and plan.

– In the US, companies must navigate a complex web of federal and state-level regulations. The lack of clear guidelines leads to questions of compliance. But still, proactive engagement with regulators and adherence to best practices can help businesses establish themselves as industry leaders.

Looking Ahead

The worldwide recognition that MiCA presents demands that the United States establish a formal regulatory structure for digital assets. Companies that successfully operate within European regulations alongside US norms will become the most competitive in the global digital asset market. In the years to come, crypto regulation will face vital changes following the US political transition and leadership.

Businesses should maintain adaptability by tracking regulatory changes, which allows them to exploit market chances in both regions.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment or financial advice.

Read more →