Explore the intricate relationship between cryptocurrency and European regulations with this captivating image showcasing a Bitcoin tethered to a chain against the backdrop of the European Union flag

MiCA Explained: What Every Crypto Investor in the EU Needs to Know

Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) of the European Union is the key to developing the Digital Assets regulation. MiCA is important for investors, token issuers, exchanges, and custodians who operate within the EU as the crypto industry progresses.

What is MiCA?

MiCA is a broad regulatory mechanism the European Union implements to govern the crypto-assets market. It creates legal clarity, protecting investors and guaranteeing stability in finances through regulating crypto aspects like:

  • Crypto-assets: Utility tokens, Stablecoins, and other digital assets not classified as financial instruments under existing EU laws.
  • Public offerings: Entails offering of crypto-assets to the public.
  • Market abuse: Activities perceived as market abuse.
  • Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs): Exchanges, wallet providers, and other intermediaries.

Timeline of Application

MiCA’s implementation is phased to allow for a smooth transition:

  • June 30, 2024: Provisions concerning asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) and e-money tokens (EMTs) became applicable, setting requirements for issuers of these Stablecoins.
  • December 30, 2024: The remaining provisions came into effect. This included regulations for other crypto-assets, CASPs, to curb market abuse. Also, registered Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) must have valid licenses before then.

 

“As of June 2024, all issuers of asset-referenced and e-money tokens operating in the EU must comply with MiCA’s stringent disclosure, reserve, and redemption requirements.”European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)

Impact on Token Issuers

Token issuers must adhere to specific requirements under MiCA:

  • – Legal Entity Registration: Issuers must be registered as legal entities within the EU.
  • – White Paper Publication: A detailed white paper outlining the project, associated risks, and technology used must be developed and submitted to authorities.
  • – Risk Communication: Clear communication of risks associated with the crypto-assets is mandatory.

 

Exemptions from these obligations include:

  • – Offers targeted only to qualified investors.

  • – Offers under €1 million over a 12-month period.

  • – Tokens offered as rewards for maintaining blockchain infrastructure.

  • – Free distributions (i.e., airdrops) not involving any form of consideration.

“White papers under MiCA must contain fair, clear, and not misleading information and be notified to national competent authorities before public offering.”Official Journal of the European Union, Regulation (EU) 2023/1114

Impact on Exchanges and Custodians

Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs), including exchanges and custodians, are subject to licensing requirements:

  • – Mandatory Licensing: CASPs must obtain a license from a competent national authority.

  • – Passporting Rights: A license granted in one EU member state is valid throughout the entire EU and EEA, streamlining cross-border operations.

  • – Substance Requirements: CASPs must have a local presence, with sufficient human and technical resources in the licensing state.

 

“MiCA introduces a harmonized licensing regime for crypto-asset service providers, enabling seamless operation across EU markets via passporting.”European Commission, MiCA Legislative Proposal

Conclusion

Through MiCA, corporate synergism exists for the crypto business within the EU, intending to achieve better investor protection and market integrity. Crypto investors, token issuers, exchanges, and custodians will be better positioned to manoeuvre in the ever-transforming digital asset waters by understanding and adhering to the provisions under MiCA.


Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, investment or financial advice.

Read more →

Bitcoin and Gold on scales

Bitcoin vs. Inflation: A Comparative Analysis with Gold

Amidst concerns about inflation, prudent investors are turning to alternative assets to preserve their purchasing power and long-term financial stability. Gold, a time-tested haven, now has a serious contender: Bitcoin. If we examine the period from 2020 to 2025, both these sought-after assets have gained traction as inflation hedges.

In this write-up, we examine the performance and volatility of key economic indicators, such as the CPI and real yields, to help you determine which asset is better suited for these changing financial times.

Performance Overview (2020–2025)

Bitcoin (BTC)

 

Gold (XAU)

  • Price Growth: Gold increased from around €1,300 per ounce in early 2020 to circa €3,000 by May 2025, a 122% surge.
  • Volatility: This precious metal maintained a more stable annualised volatility, ranging between 12% and 15%.

Inflation and Real Yields

Category

Period

Details

Consumer Price Index (CPI)

2020

Inflation spiked to 7.0% as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

2021–2022

Maintained at 6.5% in 2022.

 

2023–2025

Gradually declined to 2.4% by March 2025, aligning with the European Central Bank’s target.

Real Yields (10-Year Treasury)

2020–2021

Real yields were negative, reaching lows of around -1.0%, due to aggressive monetary easing.

 

2022–2025

The shift was positive, climbing to approximately 1.67% by April 2025, particularly with the implementation of tighter monetary policy.

Comparative Insights

1.     What is the Effectiveness of Inflation Hedging?

It is safe to say that Gold demonstrated a strong positive correlation with inflation, further reinforcing its role as a traditional hedge. In contrast, Bitcoin exhibited inconsistent behaviour in response to inflationary pressures. This is especially true with performance influenced more by market sentiment and liquidity conditions.

2.     Market Liquidity and Adoption

We can conclude that gold benefits from deep liquidity and widespread acceptance among central banks and institutional investors. On the other hand, Bitcoin’s liquidity has tremendously improved, especially with the introduction of ETFS and increased institutional adoption. However, it still faces regulatory uncertainties.

3.     Utility and Use Cases

Gold serves industrial, ornamental, and monetary purposes, including central bank reserves. In contrast, Bitcoin is primarily a digital asset used in decentralised finance (DeFi), cross-border transactions, and Blockchain-based applications.

Investor Comparison Table (2020–2025)

Criteria

Gold

Bitcoin

Investor Insight

Return on Investment

~122%

~1,300%

Bitcoin outperformed in returns but with higher volatility.

Volatility (Annualised)

12–15%

60–80%

Gold offers stability; Bitcoin entails higher risk.

Inflation Hedge

Strong positive correlation

Mixed behaviour

Gold remains a reliable hedge; Bitcoin’s role is uncertain.

Liquidity & Adoption

Deep, globally accepted

Growing, yet evolving

Gold is established; Bitcoin is gaining traction.

Utility

Industrial, monetary uses

Digital finance applications

Gold is traditional; Bitcoin is innovative.

BTC-to-Gold Ratio Analysis

The BTC-to-Gold ratio has had its fair share of fluctuations. This shows the dynamic nature of these two classes of assets. Additionally, the ratio has formed an inverted head and shoulders pattern since 2016, with key lows in 2020 and 2023. A breakout above the 40 levels would signal a surge in Bitcoin prices.

In a Nutshell

In the last decade or so, Bitcoin and Gold have both been leveraged against inflation, each with distinct characteristics:

All in all, investors should consider their risk tolerance, investment goals and portfolio diversification when choosing between these assets.

Image Source: Adobe Stock

Disclaimer: This article is purely for informational purposes. It is not offered or intended to be used for legal, tax, Investment or financial advice.

Read more →