“Real estate doesn’t suffer from poor returns. It suffers from poor exits.” — DNA Crypto.
Most real estate tokenisation content starts in the wrong place.
– Fractional ownership.
– Retail access.
– Smaller ticket sizes.
Sophisticated investors already understand these concepts. They are not the problem real estate needs to solve.
The real problem is liquidity.
Real Estate’s Core Weakness Is Illiquidity
Real estate has delivered strong long-term returns across cycles. That is not in dispute.
Its structural weakness is different.
– Capital is slow to enter.
– Capital is slower to exit.
– Transactions are costly.
– Liquidity events are binary and disruptive.
This illiquidity premium has historically compensated investors for long holding periods and limited optionality. DNACrypto explores this trade-off in Real Estate Meets Digital Gold and Rise of Real-World Assets (RWA).
Returns are rarely the issue. Exits are.
What Tokenisation Actually Changes
Tokenisation does not alter the underlying asset.
– The building still exists.
– The cash flows remain unchanged.
– The market cycle still applies.
What changes is the manner in which capital interacts with the asset.
Tokenised structures change:
- – How capital enters
- – How capital exits
- – How risk is distributed over time
This distinction is central to DNACrypto’s analysis in Real-World Asset Tokenisation and Real-World Asset Tokenisation in 2025.
Fractionalisation is a feature.
Liquidity is the value.
Optional Liquidity, Not Constant Trading
Institutions do not want daily trading in property assets.
They want optional exits.
Tokenised real estate enables:
- – Structured liquidity windows
- – Broader buyer pools at defined intervals
- – Secondary transfers without forced asset sales
- – Capital recycling without complete disposals
This is fundamentally distinct from speculative token trading, a distinction explored in Tokenised Real Estate and Tokenised Real Estate 2.0.
Liquidity does not mean volatility… It means choice.
Why Fractional Ownership Misses the Point
Fractional ownership is often presented as the breakthrough.
In reality, it solves a secondary problem.
– Institutions already syndicate.
– Funds already have pooled capital.
– Exposure is already fractional.
What they lack is efficient exit optionality.
This mirrors DNACrypto’s broader tokenisation thesis in Why Tokenisation Changes How Finance Wins, Not Who Wins.
Tokenisation improves mechanics, not power structures.
Why Regulated Environments Matter More Than Technology
Liquidity without legal clarity is an illusion.
For real estate tokenisation to work at scale, jurisdiction matters more than code.
UK, the EU and Switzerland offer:
- – Clear property law
- – Recognised investor protections
- – Enforceable transfer rights
- – Regulatory certainty
This is why institutional pilots cluster in regulated markets, as discussed in UK Labour Victory Boosts Tokenization and CBDC and BlackRock’s Tokenization Vision.
Technology enables liquidity. Regulation legitimises it.
Why Institutions Care About Exit Optionality
Institutions price liquidity explicitly.
Optional exits:
- – Lower required returns
- – Shorten holding periods
- – Improve portfolio construction
- – Reduce capital lock-up risk.
Tokenised real estate allows capital to behave more like a financial instrument without turning property into a speculative asset.
This is the maturity point crypto narratives often miss.
The DNA Crypto View
Tokenised real estate is not about selling buildings in pieces.
It concerns the introduction of controlled liquidity into an asset class characterised by rigidity.
– Fractional ownership is incidental.
– Exit optionality is essential.
Tokenisation does not make property risk-free… It makes property capital more flexible.
That is why serious investors are paying attention.
Image Source: Adobe Stock
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or investment advice.
Register today at DNACrypto.co
